jchapmanGigabit (shared) to nearly all of 53M homes and businesses. Comcast is going to upgrade 40% of the U.S. to DOCSIS 3.1, offering a gigabit. Brian's boys are going to start in 2016, probably early, and continue for another year or two. Comcast VP Robert Howald dropped a bombshell. "We're testing it this year. Our intent is to scale it through our footprint through 2016. We want to get it across the footprint very quickly. We're shooting for two years," he said in Mike Dano's Fierce Cable interview. The story was picked up by the Washington Post and a dozen others. Everyone in broadband has known for years gigabit cable was on the way and now the big papers are getting the message.  

"Shared" speeds will be 500+ megabits down 95+% of the time, I predict. That's similar to the 400-700 megabit speeds of AT&T's coming "gigaclear" G.fast fiber to the basement.

Both companies have a natural path to a reliable gigabit. DOCSIS 3.1 will begin with 5-10 gigabits downstream, shared. Much of the bandwidth will be used for delivering video over IP. Allocating 2 or 3 gigabits to the home Internet connections will deliver close to a gigabit most of the time. Comcast sees the future network being primarily video time shifted or on demand, requiring individual stream, but 10 gig leaves plenty of room for data as well.

Upstream is undetermined now. DOCSIS 3.1 in many deployments will be 100 megabits shared, but Comcast isn't being clear about whether they will have the high upstream speeds right away. Ultimately, DOCSIS 3.1 is designed for a shared gigabit upstream as well.

Videotron and Suddenlink have begun offering gigabit cable over DOCSIS 3.0.  Comcast decided to wait for DOCSIS 3.1 to offer the gigabit at a reasonable price. Meanwhile, they are offering 10M or so locations 2 gigabits for $300/month with $1,000 installation. They run fiber to the individual customer, prohibitively expensive. So it's mostly a pr stunt, biding the time until they have DOCSIS 3.1 in place and can offer the gigabit for less than $100. 

Back in 2013 I explained how cable would get to a gigabit. Manufacturers were confident they'd deliver by 2014 but it took another year. Here's what I wrote back them.

Gigabit Cable Explained (from 2013)

Standard cable coax systems have a total capacity of 4.7 gigabits when used just for data. Most of the bandwidth today is used for TV. As the TV side goes all digital, data can claim more of the pipe.

First generation cable modems shared a single 6 MHz or 8 MHz channel for a maximum speed of 35-50 megabits, shared.

DOCSIS 3 initially bonded 4 channels for 150-200 megabits downstream. The systems now coming out of the labs bond 25 channels for a shared gigabit. The typical cable system has 132 6 MHz channels, but carrying 100 HD TV channels and the remaining analog TV takes up many of those. Upstream is typically limited and offered to customers as no more than 5-6 megabits. Higher upstream speeds are practical, but would require more changes to the system and are very rarely implemented.

  Intel began sampling gigabit chips in 2012 and Arris has shown working gear at trade shows.  Kabel Deutschland CTO Glanz  is optimistic he’ll begin serving customers by the end of 2013.

  DOCSIS 3.1 is expected to be 1 gigabit (shared) upstream and 10 gigabits downstream, according to John Chapman, Cisco’s chief cable architect and a member of the committee. Manufacturers are targeting 2015 but we're two years late with DOCSIS 3.0. It uses more efficient OFDM coding and I believe will use higher frequencies as well. Most systems will require (modest) upgrades to CMTS, amplifiers and other gear. The cost should be moderate (? < $200 most places) but real.

How we got to higher speeds.    

John Chapman, Cisco’s chief architect, stunned everyone in 2005 when he defined the path to the gigabit. That was 25 times faster than anything shipping at the time. Anton Wahlman, Wall Street’s best broadband analyst, spread the word. Brian Roberts, Comcast CEO, was scared of Verizon fiber and told the DOCSIS committee to go full speed ahead. Chapman and the other DOCSIS engineers had the standard in place by 2007 but it’s taken years for the chips to be ready.

  It required world class engineering to bring DOCSIS to a gigabit but there is no magic or rocket science. The fat, shielded coaxial cable has great capacity. The termination systems have been ready for several years, at least in lab trials. Two problems needed to be solved: a modem that could handle a gigabit and freeing up the channels. A chip that can run at a billion bits a second is pretty demanding. But Moore’s Law has made chips more powerful every year. The time has come.

  Freeing enough channels would have been nearly impossible a few years ago when half or more of the channels were used for analog TV. There was a real squeeze as competition forced cablecos to carry 100 HD channels. Cablecos responded by reducing the number of analog channels and most are well on the way to going all digital.

  The digital TV also became far more bandwidth efficient with switched digital. At any given moment, 300 or 400 of the “500 channels” are not being watched by any home on a given node. The less popular channels are taken off the feed that goes to every home and “switched” in when someone tunes in. There’s a slight delay, but that’s an ok tradeoff for the increased capacity.

   U.S. cablecos are still challenged to find room in some systems so will probably be late to the gigabit unless competition like Google forces them to it. The Europeans and Asians haven’t developed as many channels so have less of a problem. Korea faces fiber competition so is a likely pioneer. In Germany, the cablecos have taken millions of customers from the telcos with higher speeds. Kabel Deutschland brags “We offer twice the speed of DSL at the same price and always will.” That’s their main sales point and gives them incentive to pioneer the highest speeds.

 

Cable is shared, so how fast will gigabit cable be in the real world?

Sharing works remarkably well. 36 megabit shared early DOCSIS was remarkably consistent at 10 megabits even with hundreds of homes on a node. Only occasionally did a node get overloaded and need to be split. If everyone was streaming Netflix in HD at the same time that would change, but the empirical evidence is that’s much less common than expected. The actual results on sharing - now with 150 meg DOCSIS 3 - are remarkably good. I didn’t believe that for years myself.

   My opinion, based on a decade of experience with cable systems and discussions with network managers, is that users will be able to download faster than 500 megabits 95+%  and probably 99% of the time on “gigabit” cable. Bandwidth demand always grows so that will change over time. Predictions are tough, especially about the future, but I’m pretty sure it will be hundreds of megabits almost all the time for a decade in any well-maintained cable network.

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2015/08/25/why-comcast-may-be-poised-to-win-the-internet-speed-race/

Comcast sees the future network being primarily video time shifted or on demand, requiring individual stream. 

Latest

April 18

“My three biggest customers are marching to 7 and 5 nanometers.” Lip-Bu Tan. Moore’s Law ain’t dead yet.

Eric Xu, current Huawei Chairman, said consumers would find no “material difference between 4G & 5G.” Dozens of top engineers agree the "5G Revolution" is hokum, including  DT CTO Bruno Jacobfeuerborn, FT/Orange SVP Arnaud Vamparys, and BT CEO Gavin Patterson.
     Politicians and marketers pushed b_______. What’s coming for 5-10 years is good for telco capacity but otherwise disappointing. Unfortunately. 
     On the other hand, mmWave & Massive MIMO are improving at a ferocious rate, advancing telco capacity enormously. Massive MIMO has made it practical to use 3.5 GHz frequencies, a second remarkable booster. The "5G Revolution" is dead; Long Live the real 5G and advanced wireless!
============
U.S. attacks on Huawei and ZTE look to be an historic disaster.


China’s logical response is to invest to become independent of the U.S. They already have $100B on the table for memory chips and are rumored to add another $100B. Huawei/HiSilicon already holds their own against Qualcomm and everyone else in the world. 
    Zeng Xuezhong of Spreadtrum, world #3 mobile chipmaker, confirms: China will “speed up the chip R&D investment that is self-controlled and self-researched. We must never forget to make it bigger and stronger.”
     U.S. warships patrolling China’s seas inspire security fears. So does Trump’s threat to a country on China’s border."Military solutions are now fully in place, locked and loaded, [for] fire, fury and frankly power, the likes of which the world has never seen before.”
     China would be stupid not to have domestic capacity just in case. The Chinese leadership is not stupid.
===========
The year's best wireless conference is next week. Ted Rappaport, Sandeep Rangan and colleagues bring the world's best engineers to the Brooklyn 5G Conference Summit. This year, Paulraj, Onoe, Fettweis, Katabi, and their peers are coming. Do not miss the webcast, http://bit.ly/2HuOKqW .

April 10

A special report: Who Are The Three Billion? The Color Of The Net Has Changed http://bit.ly/netcolor
1/3rd wireless only, 2/3rds in Global South, 75% not native English speakers.